Abstract
testing remains the most widely accessible and relatively inexpensive method for initial evaluation of suspected coronary disease and for evaluation of its severity. 1-3 Clinical usefulness has been limited, however, by poor sensitivity of standard ST-segment depression criteria for assessment of anatomic and functional coronary disease severity and for prediction of risk. 1,2,4-6 Recent data make it clear that symptomatic obstructive plaques that typically result in exercise-mediated ischemia may be less relevant to infarction and sudden death than less obstructive unstable plaques. 7 These limitations mandate a rethinking of the exercise ECG along 2 distinct lines: First, is it possible to improve the diagnostic value of the exercise ECG? Second, separate from its ability to diagnose obstructive coronary artery lesions, can the exercise test be used as a prognostic tool that can encourage effective prevention of premature deaths or coronary events? Both goals take us beyond the ST segment.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Kligfield, P., & Lauer, M. S. (2006). Exercise Electrocardiogram Testing. Circulation, 114(19), 2070–2082. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.105.561944
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.