18F-FDG PET early response evaluation of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with concomitant chemoradiotherapy

110Citations
Citations of this article
63Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The potential of 18F-FDG PET changes was evaluated for prediction of response to concomitant chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: For 28 patients, 18F-FDG PET was performed before treatment, at the end of the second week of treatment, and at 2 wk and 3 mo after the completion of treatment. Standardized uptake value (SUV), maximum SUV, metabolic tumor volume (MTV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) were obtained. Early metabolic changes were defined as fractional change (DTLG) when 18F-FDG PET at the end of the second week was compared with pretreatment 18F-FDG PET. In-treatment metabolic changes, as measured by serial 18F-FDG PET, were correlated with standard criteria of response evaluation of solid tumors by means of CT imaging (Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors 1.1). Parameters were analyzed for stratification in progression-free survival (PFS). Results: When compared with early metabolic nonresponders, a DTLG decrease of 38% or more was associated with a significantly longer PFS (1-y PFS 80% vs. 36%, P = 0.02). Pretreatment TLG was found to be a prognostic factor for PFS. Conclusion: The degree of change in TLG was predictive for response to concomitant chemoradiotherapy as early as the end of the second week into treatment for patients with locally advanced NSCLC. Pretreatment TLG was prognostic for PFS. COPYRIGHT © 2013 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Usmanij, E. A., De Geus-Oei, L. F., Troost, E. G. C., Peters-Bax, L., Van Der Heijden, E. H. F. M., Kaanders, J. H. A. M., … Bussink, J. (2013). 18F-FDG PET early response evaluation of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with concomitant chemoradiotherapy. Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 54(9), 1528–1534. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.112.116921

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free