What can the study of lead teach us about other toxicants?

19Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The history of knowledge about lead toxicity may serve as a useful template to judge and predict progress in understanding other toxicants. A paradigm shift has occurred in which toxicity has been recognized at levels long held to be harmless. This shift has been accelerated by the use of newer tools for measuring outcome. Lead effects have been identified in children at blood lead levels as low as 15 μg/dL. They include impaired psychometric intelligence, language function, attention, and classroom behavior. Lead exposure during pregnancy results in increased risk for minor malformations and lowered infant IQ scores until at least 2 years of age. Understanding of this toxicant has been blurred by seven unrecognized Type II errors frequently encountered in the lead literature. These errors are discussed. A meta-analysis of thirteen informative lead studies in children is presented. The joint probability of the findings occurring by chance under the null hypothesis is <3 x 10-12.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Needleman, H. L. (1990). What can the study of lead teach us about other toxicants? In Environmental Health Perspectives (Vol. 86, pp. 183–189). https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.9086183

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free