Randomized trial of ultrasound-indicated cerclage in singleton women without lower genital tract inflammation

37Citations
Citations of this article
56Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Aim This is the first report of a randomized trial of cerclage on pure cervical shortening without vaginosis or cervicitis. The objective of our multicenter randomized controlled trial was to assess the benefits of ultrasound-indicated cervical cerclage in the mid-trimester to prevent preterm birth in women who have no signs of infection or inflammation of the lower genital tract. Material and Methods Women with a short cervical length < 25 mm between 16 and 26 weeks of gestation were randomly assigned to receive a Shirodkar cerclage, McDonald cerclage, or bedrest (no cerclage). Before being randomly assigned to one of the three groups, all women were screened for infection/inflammation of the lower genital tract; those with positive results were excluded from the study. The ratio of preterm delivery as a primary end-point was evaluated in the groups. Results A total of 106 singleton patients with a short cervical length were assessed for study eligibility; 106 patients were randomized to the three treatment options. Ultimately, 98 patients (in the Shirodkar [n = 34], McDonald [n = 34] and bedrest [n = 30] groups) were analyzed. No differences in preterm delivery or perinatal outcomes were found between the three groups. Significantly fewer patients in the Shirodkar group required hospitalization for treatment of threatened preterm labor when compared to patients in the bedrest group. Conclusion For women with a short cervical length < 25 mm between 16 and 26 weeks of gestation, Shirodkar cerclage might be considered to reduce the occurrence of threatened preterm labor.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Otsuki, K., Nakai, A., Matsuda, Y., Shinozuka, N., Kawabata, I., Makino, Y., … Okai, T. (2016). Randomized trial of ultrasound-indicated cerclage in singleton women without lower genital tract inflammation. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research, 42(2), 148–157. https://doi.org/10.1111/jog.12880

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free