Abstract
Aim - To study prospectively the outcome of conservative and surgical treatment of chalazia provided by medical and nursing staff. Methods - During a 5 month recruitment period all patients attending a district general eye hospital for treatment of chalazion were included in the study. 129 patients (217 visits) with chalazia were seen by either a senior nurse or a trainee ophthalmologist (senior house officer, SHO) or both. Patients received either conservative treatment or eversion of the eyelid with incision and curettage. Patients were mailed a questionnaire asking them if their cyst had resolved and how they rated their treatment. Marginal cost analysis was used to determine the cost of treatment. Results - The outcome of treatment could be determined in 170 of the 217 visits. Conservative treatment was successful for 29% of cysts while surgical treatment was successful for 72%. There was no significant difference in treatment outcome between nurse and SHO groups. Patients found nurse treatment acceptable with a high level of patient satisfaction. The marginal cost of treatment by a nurse was u9.91 per cyst compared with u12.10 for SHOs. There were no surgical complications and no evidence of malignancy in six biopsies. Conclusions - Surgical treatment of chalazion is safe and effective and successfully treats approximately three quarters of selected cysts. With conservative treatment approximately one third of selected chalazia will resolve within 3 months. Nurse treatment of chalazion is safe, effective, and acceptable to patients.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Jackson, T. L., & Beun, L. (2000). A prospective study of cost, patient satisfaction, and outcome of treatment of chalazion by medical and nursing staff. British Journal of Ophthalmology, 84(7), 782–785. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.84.7.782
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.