Abstract
By examining polemical treatises on Sufi samā'or ‘spiritual audition’, written by scholars with a Hanbalī or traditionalist orientation, we assess the strategies and rhetorical devices that they used to discuss the status of samā' within their tradition. Our exploration reveals a clear difference in approach between pre-Taymiyyan scholars, on the one hand, and ‘Taymiyyan’ scholars, including Ibn Taymiyya (d. 728/1328) himself, on the other. Unlike their predecessors, the latter systematically refer to the legacy of esteemed figures from the formative period of Sufism, such as al-Junayd (d. 289/910) and some of his contemporaries, invoking his spiritual authority to consolidate the relation between Ahl al-Hadīth traditionalism and what they considered to be Sufism in its ‘true’ form.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Post, A., & Van Eyken, S. (2024). Ibn Taymiyya and his Circle on samā’: a means to Purify Sufism? (with an Arabic edition of al-Wāsitī’s (d. 711/1311) Bulgha). Islamic Law and Society, 31(1–2), 30–59. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685195-bja10051
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.