Abstract
This article makes two contributions to the literature linking penalties charged by competition authorities to observed cartel price overcharges. (i) It extends the theory of optimal penalties by introducing new considerations regarding the timing of penalty decisions. Drawing on a new European data set to calculate these additional factors, the optimal penalty is shown to be approximately 75% of that implied by the conventional formula. (ii) It shows that because penalties are typically imposed on revenue, a tougher regime may increase cartel overcharges. This calls into question some recent empirical findings on this issue and the potential benefits of raising penalties. © 2013 The Author(s).
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Katsoulacos, Y., & Ulph, D. (2013). Antitrust penalties and the implications of empirical evidence on cartel overcharges. Economic Journal, 123(572). https://doi.org/10.1111/ecoj.12075
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.