Antitrust penalties and the implications of empirical evidence on cartel overcharges

32Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This article makes two contributions to the literature linking penalties charged by competition authorities to observed cartel price overcharges. (i) It extends the theory of optimal penalties by introducing new considerations regarding the timing of penalty decisions. Drawing on a new European data set to calculate these additional factors, the optimal penalty is shown to be approximately 75% of that implied by the conventional formula. (ii) It shows that because penalties are typically imposed on revenue, a tougher regime may increase cartel overcharges. This calls into question some recent empirical findings on this issue and the potential benefits of raising penalties. © 2013 The Author(s).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Katsoulacos, Y., & Ulph, D. (2013). Antitrust penalties and the implications of empirical evidence on cartel overcharges. Economic Journal, 123(572). https://doi.org/10.1111/ecoj.12075

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free