Are vital neighbourhoods socially privileged? Exploring the spatial relationship between urban vitality and urban vulnerability

6Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

The built environment plays a key role in everyday wellbeing, as well-designed and accessible environments help fulfil people’s daily needs and activities. Of special relevance is the urban vitality concept of Jane Jacobs, a core principle of local planning strategies worldwide, which is used as an indicator of street vibrancy and quality of life among city residents. However, the promotion of her ideas on dense, lively, and diverse neighbourhoods coexists with increasing urban inequalities. The present study aims to examine if, and how, vital places are related with different levels of social vulnerability. To do so, we use Exploratory Spatial Data Analysis (ESDA) of synthetic indicators of both vitality and vulnerability. Our results provide evidence of local associations between urban vitality and urban vulnerability, and identify four main scenarios that can be helpful for policy intervention. The findings of this study have the potential to guide urban planning strategies to promote vital environments while preventing situations of social vulnerability.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gómez-Varo, I., Delclòs-Alió, X., Miralles-Guasch, C., & Marquet, O. (2024). Are vital neighbourhoods socially privileged? Exploring the spatial relationship between urban vitality and urban vulnerability. Local Environment, 29(7), 969–985. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2024.2324294

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free