Misled and confused? Telling the public about MMR vaccine safety

30Citations
Citations of this article
42Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The extraordinary events surrounding the measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine in the United Kingdom have not only placed in jeopardy the use of this triple vaccine but have also spread concern to other parts of the world. Examination of the public's worry about MMR vaccine reveals they have been exposed to a range of conflicting views resulting in the feeling of having been misled about the safety of the vaccine. There are various groups and individuals who have legitimate roles in informing the public about such subjects. But is each one behaving in an ethically responsible way? And if confidence falters, vaccine coverage dips, and an outbreak of measles, mumps, or rubella ensues, who, if anyone, will stand and say "I misled them, I confused them, this is my responsibility"? We examine the ethical issues of each group with a voice in the debate about vaccine safety.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Clements, C. J., & Ratzan, S. (2003). Misled and confused? Telling the public about MMR vaccine safety. Journal of Medical Ethics, 29(1), 22–26. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.29.1.22

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free