The Good, the Bad, and the Not-So-Terrible: A Comprehensive Analysis of Sinclair’s Effect on Local Television News Quality

0Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Critics accuse the Sinclair television ownership group of slashing resources and producing biased news. However, few scholars have examined Sinclair’s news quality. Using an investment-based approach to quality, this study provides the first systematic human-coded examination of Sinclair’s local video news quality. Data from 2,300 stories in 40 U.S. markets indicated lower overall quality at Sinclair-owned stations compared to competitors. However, Sinclair outperformed competitors on some quality metrics, and evidence of political bias was minimal. Findings provide insights into how corporate ownership affects local TV, the most trusted source of news in the United States.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Abdenour, J., Denneny, M., Maduneme, E., Miller, K. C., Hedding, K. J., & Blankenship, J. C. (2026). The Good, the Bad, and the Not-So-Terrible: A Comprehensive Analysis of Sinclair’s Effect on Local Television News Quality. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 103(2), 542–568. https://doi.org/10.1177/10776990261424267

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free