Readmission after inferior vena cava filter placement for acute venous thromboembolism in the United States: Impact of a cancer diagnosis

1Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: Inferior vena cava filter (IVCF) use is common after a venous thromboembolic event (VTE). Cancer is associated with higher rates of VTEs and is also seen in a significant proportion of patients requiring IVCF. As hospital readmissions remain a frequently scrutinized metric, we sought to evaluate the impact of cancer on hospital-readmission rates and in-hospital outcomes among patients with VTEs who received an IVCF. Methods: Leveraging the 2013 to 2014 Nationwide Readmission Database, we identified adult patients presenting with a VTE in the United States and evaluated 30-day readmission rates and readmission in-hospital outcomes postindex-admission. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with readmission after an index-procedure, including traditional and nontraditional cardiovascular risk factors, as well as hospital-level characteristics. Results: Among the 619 241 patients presenting with a VTE at index-admission, 11.2% of patients received IVCF on index-admission, of which 30.9% had cancer. The 30-day readmission rate amongst IVCF recipients was 15.8% (N = 10 927), and 19.9% amongst those with cancer compared to 13.9% in patients without cancer (P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Guha, A., Dey, A. K., McKinley, G., Carter, R. R., Miller, P. E., Deshmukh, A. J., … Addison, D. (2020). Readmission after inferior vena cava filter placement for acute venous thromboembolism in the United States: Impact of a cancer diagnosis. Journal of Cardiac Surgery, 35(9), 2275–2278. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocs.14820

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free