Effect of first line gastric cancer chemotherapy regime on the AGS cell line-MTT assay results

6Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Combination chemotherapy regimes are common treatments for cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluation the effect of individual chemotherapeutic agents in comparison with a first line chemotherapy regime treatment in the AGS gastric cancer cell line by MTT assay. Materials and Methods: In this experimental study, AGS cells were grown in RPMI-1640 supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum and 100 IU/ml penicillin, and 10 μg/ml streptomycinin, under a humidified condition at 37°C with 5% CO2. All cells were washed with PBS and detached with trypsin, centrifuged and 8000 cells re-plated on to 96-well plates. LD50 doses of Epirubicin, Cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil were added to each well in mono or triple therapy. Anti-proliferative activities were determined by MTT assay after 24, 48 or 72 h. Results: Results of MTT assays showed that there were no significant differences among 3 drugs in monotherapy (p=0.088), but there was significant difference between combination therapy with epirubicin (P=0.031) and 5FU (p=0.013) on cell survival at 24 h. After 48 and 72 hours, cell viability showed significant differences between the 3 drugs (p=0.048 and P=0.000 for 48 and 72 h, respectively) and there was significant difference between combination therapy with epirubicin (P=0.035 and P=0.002 for 48 and 72 h, respectively). Conclusions: The results showed no significant differences between these chemotherapy drugs each given alone, but combination therapy with 3 drugs had significant effects on cell viability in comparison with epirubicin alone.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Alizadeh-Navaei, R., Rafiei, A., Abedian-Kenari, S., Asgarian-Omran, H., Valadan, R., & Hedayatizadeh-Omran, A. (2016). Effect of first line gastric cancer chemotherapy regime on the AGS cell line-MTT assay results. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, 17(1), 131–133. https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2016.17.1.131

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free