Optimization of the left ventricle ejection fraction estimate obtained during cardiac adenosine stress 82Rubidium-PET scanning: impact of different reconstruction protocols

5Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) estimation using adenosine stress myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) can be challenging. The short half-life of adenosine and the guideline-recommended adenosine infusion stop during Rubidium-82 acquisition protocol may affect the accuracy and repeatability of the LVEF measures. Methods: This study comprised 25 healthy volunteers (median age 23 years) who underwent repeat myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) sessions employing Rubidium-82 PET/CT. A guideline-recommended reconstruction protocol was used for both rest and adenosine stress MPI (150-360 s post-radiotracer injection, standardrecon). For the stress MPI protocol, two additional reconstruction protocols were considered; one was employing 60 seconds data (150-210 seconds, shortfixed) and the other a dynamic frame window based on the bolus arrival of Rubidium-82 in the heart until 210 seconds (x-210 seconds, shortindividual). We report rest and stress LVEF, the LVEF reserve, and the LVEF reserve repeatability. Results: Differences in the LVEF assessments were observed between the guideline recommended and alternative reconstruction protocol (LVEF stress MPI: standardrecon = 68 ± 7%, shortfixed = 71 ± 7% (P =.08), shortindividual = 72 ± 7% (P =.04)), and the LVEF reserve was reduced for the guideline-recommended protocol (standardrecon = 7.8 ± 3.5, shortfixed = 10.1 ± 3.7, shortindividual = 10.5 ± 3.6, all P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lassen, M. L., Wissenberg, M., Byrne, C., Kjaer, A., & Hasbak, P. (2022). Optimization of the left ventricle ejection fraction estimate obtained during cardiac adenosine stress 82Rubidium-PET scanning: impact of different reconstruction protocols. Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, 29(6), 3369–3378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-022-02946-1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free