The teacher who develops Inquiry-based Science Teaching: what do the research say?

2Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This paper is a literature review on the Inquiry-based Science Teaching (IST), with emphasis on the actions of the Teacher who develops the Inquiry-based Science Teaching (TIST). Considering 58 articles on IST published between 2009 and 2019 in 5 Science Education journals, two types of action were identified: TIST actions directly related to the inquiry-based activities carried out with students (Macrocategory A, most recurrent in the data) and TIST actions related to other teaching activities, in addition to the inquiry-based activities carried out with students (Macrocategory B, less frequent in the corpus). Macrocategory A covers both typical TIST actions and actions that the teacher performs in other didactic approaches. These set of actions seems to characterize the TIST work in the classroom. Macrocategory B refers to actions such as planning and reflection. These actions, less frequent in the data, are essential not only for carrying out inquiry-based activities, but also for thinking about teacher education to develop inquiry-based activities. This work highlights the multiplicity and complexity of TIST actions and points to the importance of other research dimensions for IST, especially those that emphasize TIST as a subject that enables the conditions for the materialization of IST in the classroom.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Maximo-Pereira, M., & Cunha, A. M. (2021). The teacher who develops Inquiry-based Science Teaching: what do the research say? Investigacoes Em Ensino de Ciencias, 26(3), 134–154. https://doi.org/10.22600/1518-8795.ienci2021v26n3p134

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free