Treatment of hospitalized patients with complicated skin and skin structure infections: Double-blind, randomized, multicenter study of piperacillin-tazobactam versus ticarcillin-clavulanate

99Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We compared the efficacy and safety of two β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitor combinations, namely, piperacillin-tazobactam and ticarcillin- clavulanate, in the treatment of complicated bacterial infections of skin that required hospitalization. The study was a randomized, double-blind, comparative trial involving 20 centers. The infections were classified as (i) cellulitis with drainage, (ii) cutaneous abscess, (iii) diabetic or ischemic foot infection, and (iv) infected wounds and ulcers with drainage. The clinical response rates were comparable for the two treatment regimens (61% of the patients were cured with piperacillin-tazobactam and ticarcillin- clavulanate and improvement was seen in 15 and 16% of patients treated with piperacillin-tazobactam and ticarcillin-clavulanate, respectively). Both regimens were found to be safe and well tolerated. These data support the use of piperacillin-tazobactam for initial empiric therapy of hospitalized patients with complicated skin and skin structure infections.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tan, J. S., Wishnow, R. M., Talan, D. A., Duncanson, F. P., Norden, C. W., Hanna, C., … Low, I. (1993). Treatment of hospitalized patients with complicated skin and skin structure infections: Double-blind, randomized, multicenter study of piperacillin-tazobactam versus ticarcillin-clavulanate. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 37(8), 1580–1586. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.37.8.1580

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free