Medical school department chair performance improvement: A qualitative study

0Citations
Citations of this article
45Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Introduction In medical education, department chairs should play a significant role. The present qualitative study was conducted to identify factors that influence the performance improvement of department chairs at medical schools in Iran. Methods The study was conducted in Iran in 2022 and used a thematic analysis method. Using a purposeful sampling method, 20 participants were invited to participate, including medical school deans and department chairs. Focus group discussion (FGD) was used for qualitative data gathering. Braun and Clarke’s thematic analysis was used to analyze data. Results There were 18 males and 2 females among the participants. The mean age of the participants was 45±4 years. Five overarching themes were formulated: human resource management, organizational behavior management, performance support system, leadership, and financial resources. Also, nine subthemes emerged, including performance evaluation, job and work design, educational and non-educational support, motivational efforts, organization culture, organizational knowledge management, planning for change, and financing. Conclusions In this study, we found factors influencing DC performance improvement. Department chairs’ effective performance may have a positive impact on department operations, processes, or outcomes.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mahboubi, M., Ahmady, S., Mirzazadeh, A., Zarei, A., Hamidi, H., & Kohan, N. (2024). Medical school department chair performance improvement: A qualitative study. PLoS ONE, 19(3 March), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0294927

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free