Options for Avoiding Counterinsurgencies

  • Ucko D
  • Egnell R
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

How can the West continue to shape international order without over-committing itself to ruinous and ambiguous opera- tions on the scale of Iraq and Afghanistan? This article addresses this question by examining the failures of counterinsurgency in Af- ghanistan, and by outlining three alternatives for future engagements: the Libya model, the indirect approach, and contingency operations in support of multilateral organizations. Each presents unique possibilities, but the imperative for strategic clarity and com- mitment is consistent.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ucko, D. H., & Egnell, R. C. (2014). Options for Avoiding Counterinsurgencies. The US Army War College Quarterly: Parameters, 44(1). https://doi.org/10.55540/0031-1723.2793

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free