Changes in corneal sensation following 20 and 23 G vitrectomy in diabetic and non-diabetic patients

6Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the changes in corneal sensation (CS) following two different port sizes vitrectomy in diabetic and non-diabetic patients. Patients and Methods: Patients prepared for pars plana vitrectomy were randomly assigned to four groups: diabetics to either 20 G or 23 G and non-diabetics to either 20 G or 23 G vitrectomy systems. CS was measured using the Cochet-Bonnet aesthesiometer at baseline preoperatively, and at 1 day, 1 week, and 1 month postoperative. Results: A total of 40 eyes of 40 patients were included in this study; 20 patients (20 eyes) in each of the 20-G and 23-G groups. The mean age was 55.51±10 years and male/female ratio was 2:3. There were no significant difference between CS at baseline, and at 1 day, 1 week, and 1 month between both the 20-G and 23-G groups. There were significant drops in CSs at 1 day and 1 week for both groups (20 G and 23 G) with incomplete recovery for the 20-G group and complete recovery for the 23-G group. Comparing the two diabetic subgroups (20 G and 23 G) and two non-diabetic subgroups (20 G and 23 G), there were no significant differences in CS between subgroups. Diabetics' eyes had lower CSs throughout the study period in the 20-G and 23-G groups, which was significant at day1 and week 1 postoperatively. Conclusion: The vitrectomy procedure showed reduction in CS in the postoperative period with minimal nonsignificant difference between 20 G and 23 G systems. However, diabetics' eyes showed compromised CS preoperatively and a further significant reduction for 1 month postoperatively compared with non-diabetics.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mahgoub, M. M., & Macky, T. A. (2014). Changes in corneal sensation following 20 and 23 G vitrectomy in diabetic and non-diabetic patients. Eye (Basingstoke), 28(11), 1286–1291. https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2014.156

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free