Multicenter evaluation of the cepheid xpert® hbv viral load test

19Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Accurate measurement of the hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA is important for the management of patients with chronic HBV infection. Here, the performance of the Xpert® HBV Viral Load test (Xpert HBV Viral Load) versus the Roche COBAS® Ampliprep/COBAS® TaqMan® system (CAP/CTM HBV) HBV test v2.0 was evaluated. From September 2017 to December 2017, a total of 876 prospectively collected or archived serum or EDTA plasma specimens from subjects chronically infected with HBV were tested using the Xpert HBV Viral Load and the CAP/CTM HBV v2.0 assays. Of the 876 specimens tested, 560 were within the quantitative range of both assays. The agreement between the two methods was 90.0%. No difference in plasma or serum samples was observed. Deming regression analysis showed a good correlation of the Xpert HBV Viral Load assay with the CAP/CTM HBV v2.0 assay. The Bland–Altman analysis showed a good agreement between the results of the Xpert HBV Viral Load assay and the CAP/CTM HBV assay, with a mean difference (±1.96 standard deviation) of 0.0091 ± 0.3852 Log IU/mL. Comparing the two assays, only nineteen specimens (2.1%) had a difference greater than 1.96 times the standard deviation. The Xpert® HBV Viral Load test is suitable for monitoring patients with HBV infection and is useful in diagnostic settings.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Marcuccilli, F., Chevaliez, S., Muller, T., Colagrossi, L., Abbondanza, G., Beyser, K., … Ciotti, M. (2021). Multicenter evaluation of the cepheid xpert® hbv viral load test. Diagnostics, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11020297

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free