Ultraviolet Powder versus Ultraviolet Gel for Assessing Environmental Cleaning

  • Munoz-Price L
  • Fajardo-Aquino Y
  • Arheart K
14Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

We compared cleaning rates associated with use of a white ultraviolet (UV) powder versus a transparent UV gel among units with various degrees of previous experience with UV powder. The study outcome was the presence of discordant cleaning (removal of powder without the removal of gel, or vice versa). We found higher frequency of discordance in high-experience units (31%) than in no-experience units (8%) ( P < .001). These findings suggest preferential cleaning of visible UV targets among units with high levels of previous experience with powder. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2012;33(2):192-195

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Munoz-Price, L. S., Fajardo-Aquino, Y., & Arheart, K. L. (2012). Ultraviolet Powder versus Ultraviolet Gel for Assessing Environmental Cleaning. Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 33(2), 192–195. https://doi.org/10.1086/663713

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free