Scaffold Flatness: Reversing the Trend

  • Tajabadi F
  • Campitelli M
  • Quinn R
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Fraction sp 3 (Fsp 3) values were used to compare the flatness of known scaffolds (used as privileged structures, drug scaffolds, and in scaffold-hopping approaches) and natural product (NP) scaffolds. The vast majority of the known synthetic scaffolds are planar with Fsp 3 values <0.45 while the NP scaffold set is composed of mainly non-flat scaffolds. The identification of new or novel scaffolds to provide libraries of small diverse bioactive compounds is of the utmost importance to chemical biology and medicinal chemistry research. Non-flat scaffolds embedded in NPs may explore neglected areas of chemical space. We performed a scaffold abstraction from the dictionary of natural products (DNP), which resulted in 15,822 scaffolds. From this scaffold set, the vast majority (70 {%}), are non-flat scaffolds with Fsp 3 value >0.45. These non-flat scaffolds may cover 83 {%} of ring systems that are absent from screening set.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tajabadi, F. M., Campitelli, M. R., & Quinn, R. J. (2013). Scaffold Flatness: Reversing the Trend. Springer Science Reviews, 1(1–2), 141–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40362-013-0014-7

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free