A thematic review of argumentation studies at the K-8 level

32Citations
Citations of this article
95Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This research aimed to thematically review the argumentation studies at the K-8 level from 2006 to 2016. Given the criteria 'the K-8 level and a period of 2006-2016' for the argumentation studies, relevant databases yielded a total of 73 articles and 9 theses. These studies were exposed to thematically content analysis via such parameters as aim, method/design, sample, data collection, data analysis, subject employed for argumentation, type of used argumentation, argumentation model, general knowledge claim and recommendation. The results indicated that most of the argumentation studies examined the effect of argumentation on student achievement and attitudes towards science. Also, these studies under investigation mostly used experimental research design while generally preferring scales and audio-video records for data collection tools. Moreover, the argumentation activities were mostly developed in 'physics' topics and middle school level. The results of the current study suggest to deploy different methods (e.g. argumentation accompanied with gamification) to improve argumentation skills from primary school level.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Baǧ, H., & Çalik, M. (2017). A thematic review of argumentation studies at the K-8 level. Egitim ve Bilim, 42(190), 281–303. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2017.6845

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free