Endoscopic sphincterotomy in the treatment of cholangiopancreatic diseases

7Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Aim: To investigate the therapeutic effect of endoscopic sphinderotomy (EST) in the treatment of choledocholithiasis and stenosing papillitis. Methods: A total of 1 026 patients undergoing EST during July 1983 to May 2003 at the institute were retrospectively analyzed. Chronic pancreatitis was diagnosed in 63 (6.1%), cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis in 549 (53.5%), stones in residual biliary duct in 249 (24.3%), stenosing papillitis in 228 (22.2%). In patients with simple stenosing papillitis, most incisions were within 0.5-1 cm in length. As for patients with chronic pancreatitis simultaneously, selective pancreatic sphincterotomy was performed, and incision was within 0.5-0.8 cm in length. For stones less than 1 cm, incision was from 1 to 1.5 cm, and for those larger than 1 cm, incision ranged from 1.5 to 3 cm. For stones more than 2 cm in diameter, detritus basket rather than simple incision was chosen. Results: Of the 798 patients with choledocholithiasis, 764 (93.5%) had successful stone clearance, 215 (94.3%) out of 228 cases of stenosing papillitis were cured totally, while 63 had chronic pancreatitis developed from stenosing papillitis, 57 (90.1%) had sound remission of symptoms, though membranous stenosis emerged in 13 of 57 which was treated with balloon dilatation. After the operation, only 21 cases (2.1%) had complications such as severe pancreatitis and incision bleeding. None of the patients died. Conclusion: EST is an ideal surgical management with mini-invasion in the treatment of choledocholithiasis and stenosing papillitis. © 2005 The WJG Press and Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Li, Z. H., Chen, M., Liu, J. K., Ding, J., & Dong, J. H. (2005). Endoscopic sphincterotomy in the treatment of cholangiopancreatic diseases. World Journal of Gastroenterology, 11(17), 2678–2680. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v11.i17.2678

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free