Evaluation of multidisciplinary team decisions in neuroendocrine neoplasms: Impact of expert centres

18Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the impact of multidisciplinary team (MDT) meetings on the management of patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs). Methods: All newly referred gastro-entero-pancreatic (GEP)-NEN patients discussed from 1 April to 1 October 2017 in the MDT of seven European expert centres were prospectively included. The impact on patients' management was defined as a change in diagnosis, grade, stage or treatment. Results: A total of 292 patients were included, mainly small intestinal (siNENs) (32%) and pancreatic NENs (28%), with distant metastases in 51%. Patients had received prior surgery in 43% of cases and prior medical treatment in 32%. A significant change occurred in 61% of NENs: 7% changes in diagnosis, 8% in grade and 16% in stage. The MDT recommended a new treatment for 51% of patients, mainly surgery (9%) or somatostatin analogues (20%). A significant change was most frequently observed in patients with Stage IV disease (hazard ratio [HR] 3.6, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.9–6.9 vs. Stage I) and G2 NENs (vs. G1, HR 2.1 95% CI: 1.2–3.8). Conclusion: NEN-dedicated MDT discussion in expert centres yields significant management changes in over 60% of patients and thus represents the gold standard for the management of these patients.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zandee, W. T., Merola, E., Poczkaj, K., de Mestier, L., Klümpen, H. J., Geboes, K., … Munir, A. (2022). Evaluation of multidisciplinary team decisions in neuroendocrine neoplasms: Impact of expert centres. European Journal of Cancer Care, 31(6). https://doi.org/10.1111/ecc.13639

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free