Implicit Aptitude in SLA, in Contrast to Explicit Aptitude

  • Park S
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Early conceptions of aptitude were concerned with explicit learning abilities in formal learning settings, which according to MLAT (Modern Language Aptitude Test) were measurable based on a phonemic coding ability, an inductive learning ability, an associative memory, and a grammatical sensitivity (Carroll, 1962). However, recent understanding on aptitude has expanded Carroll’s (1962) propositions by exploring the manifestations of aptitude’s roles beyond conscious learning (Li, 2020). In other words, while aptitude has largely been conceived as explicit learning abilities in instructional settings, current research is shedding light on implicit aptitude and cognitive abilities that are activated during the unconscious processing of learning materials (i.e., in naturalistic learning settings). Clearly, there is a need for implicit learning to be investigated in light of implicit aptitude, instead of merely focusing on the explicit learning process and its outcome.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Park, S. M. (2020). Implicit Aptitude in SLA, in Contrast to Explicit Aptitude. Studies in Applied Linguistics and TESOL, 20(2). https://doi.org/10.52214/salt.v20i2.7473

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free