THU0196 TOFACITINIB IN PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS AND INDICATIVE OF DEPRESSION AND/OR ANXIETY: A POST HOC ANALYSIS OF PHASE 3 AND PHASE 3B/4 CLINICAL TRIALS

  • Citera G
  • Jain R
  • Irazoque-Palazuelos F
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objectives: Depression and anxiety are common in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The 36‐Item Short Form Health Survey (SF‐36) Mental Component Summary (MCS)≤38 has been used to identify probable major depressive disorder and/or probable generalized anxiety disorder (pMDD/pGAD) in patients with RA.1 Tofacitinib is an oral JAK inhibitor for the treatment of RA. We assessed pMDD/pGAD prevalence by SF‐36 MCS≤38 status in tofacitinib clinical trials for RA, and efficacy by baseline pMDD/pGAD status. Methods: This post hoc analysis pooled data from five Phase 3 trials and one Phase 3b/4 trial, and included patients receiving tofacitinib 5 or 10mg twice daily (BID), adalimumab 40mg every other week (ADA), or placebo, with non‐missing baseline SF‐36 MCS. Demographics/baseline characteristics were reported by baseline pMDD/pGAD status (SF‐36MCS ≤38, presence; >38, absence). At Months (M)3/6/9/12, SF‐36 MCS change from baseline (Δ) was estimated bymodeling pooled data and percentage of patients with pMDD/pGAD reported. Efficacy endpoints (American College of Rheumatology [ACR]20/50/70 response rates; Disease Activity Score in 28 joints, erythrocyte sedimentation rate [DAS28‐4(ESR)]<2.6 rates; ΔHealth Assessment Questionnaire‐ Disability Index [HAQ DI]) were estimated atM3/6/12 by linear models, comparing tofacitinib‐treated patients by baseline pMDD/pGAD status. Results: Baseline pMDD/pGAD were reported in 44.5% (tofacitinib 5mg BID), 39.8% (tofacitinib 10mg BID), 45.4% (ADA), and 39.1% (placebo) of patients. At baseline, higher C‐reactive protein levels and worse disability, fatigue, pain, and sleep were reported in patients with vs without pMDD/pGAD. A numerically, and sometimes significantly, greater increase in SF‐36 MCS was reported with tofacitinib vs placebo/ADA (ADA throughM12). The proportion of patients with baseline pMDD/pGAD who continued to have pMDD/pGAD atM3/6/9/12was generally lower with tofacitinib vs placebo/ADAand had reduced from baseline by 61.9‐63.7% at M12. Efficacy at M3/6/12 was generally similar with tofacitinib 5 and 10mg BID, irrespective of baseline pMDD/pGAD status. Conclusions: Around 40% of patients with RA had baseline pMDD/pGAD identified by SF‐36 MCS≤38. Improvement in SF‐36 MCS was greater in patients receiving tofacitinib vs placebo/ADA. In tofacitinib‐treated patients, the proportion with pMDD/pGAD reduced by 60% at M12. Tofacitinib efficacy was similar in thosewith/without baseline pMDD/pGAD. Future research using a gold‐standard psychiatric interview is required to validate SF‐36 MCS≤38 in the identification of pMDD/pGAD.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Citera, G., Jain, R., Irazoque-Palazuelos, F., Guzman, R., Madariaga, H., Gruben, D. C., … Ponce de Leon, D. (2020). THU0196 TOFACITINIB IN PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS AND INDICATIVE OF DEPRESSION AND/OR ANXIETY: A POST HOC ANALYSIS OF PHASE 3 AND PHASE 3B/4 CLINICAL TRIALS. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 79, 318–319. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-eular.417

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free