A comparative study of conjunctival autograft and minimally invasive pterygium surgery in primary pterygia

9Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This study aimed at comparing the results of the Conjunctival Autograft Technique (CAG) and Minimally Invasive Pterygium Surgery (MIPS) in primary pterygium excisions. This was a prospective randomized clinical study performed during a one-year period (2009-2010). One hundred and twenty two patients with primary pterygium were randomized in 2 groups: group A (CAG) including 36 patients and group B (MIPS) including 86 patients. The two groups were compared considering the recurrence rate and probable complications of the procedures. Recurrences were detected in 4 patients (11.1%) in group A and 5 patients (5.8%) in group B with no significant difference in this regard (p = 0.447). No major complications occurred during the follow-up period. This study showed that acceptable recurrence- free rates could be achieved (albeit nonsignificant) using MIPS technique in patients with primary pterygium and can be considered as a good alternative in the surgical management of pterygia because of its simplicity and low surgical time. © 2010 Asian Network for Scientific Information.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bazzazi, N., Ramezani, A., & Rabiee, M. A. S. (2010). A comparative study of conjunctival autograft and minimally invasive pterygium surgery in primary pterygia. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 13(8), 409–412. https://doi.org/10.3923/pjbs.2010.409.412

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free