Apparatuses of animality: Foucault goes to a slaughterhouse

39Citations
Citations of this article
43Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The work of Michel Foucault is not often considered in animal ethics discussions, but I believe that many of his insights can be fruitfully extended into this area of philosophical inquiry. In this paper, I present the slaughterhouse as a technology of power that is complicit in the domination and objectification of both human and nonhuman animal subjects. I begin by arguing that Foucault's notion of an 'apparatus" is a useful methodological tool for thinking about the constellation of spaces and discourses in which various bodies (both human and nonhuman) find themselves enmeshed. Next, I outline Foucault's multi-faceted conceptualization of 'power," and I consider whether it makes sense to think of other animals as implicated in 'power relations" in the various Foucauldian senses. Finally, I analyze a journalistic account of a contemporary slaughterhouse. Here, I argue that a variety of hierarchies (spatial, racial, species, etc.) dovetail to create an environment in which care and concern are virtually impossible. By coupling a Foucauldian analysis with certain insights developed in the bioethical work of Ralph Acampora, I offer a normative critique of an institution that has pernicious effects on both human and nonhuman animals. © Stephen Thierman 2010.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Thierman, S. (2010). Apparatuses of animality: Foucault goes to a slaughterhouse. Foucault Studies, (9), 89–110. https://doi.org/10.22439/fs.v0i9.3061

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free