Sectioning on the street – futility or utility?

  • Timms P
  • Perry J
2Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

It seems clear that a small but significant number of people are simply ill-served by the existing format of mainstream mental health services. It may be (as I have heard in a European 'quality' forum) that such people are just peculiarly difficult. This seems unlikely, given a recent outcomes study we did of the most alienated and intractable of our referrals-people who live on the street and who have not been engaged by the sustained efforts of experienced street outreach teams. The intervention concerned was involuntary admission to hospital under a section of the Mental Health Act. 4 One year later, the majority were still engaged with the specialist mental health team and were still in accommodation. Here is an area ripe for research-the vital factors that enable such teams to engage effectively, and to maintain that engagement, with homeless people with psychotic disorders. 1 Craig TKJ, Timms PW. Out of the wards and onto the streets? Deinstitutionalization and homelessness in Britain. J Ment Health 1992; 1: 265-75. 2 Winkler P, Barrett B, McCrone P, Csé my L, Janous ˘ ková M, Hö schl C. Deinstitutionalised patients, homelessness and imprisonment: systematic review. Br J Psychiatry 2016; 208: 421-8.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Timms, P., & Perry, J. (2016). Sectioning on the street – futility or utility? BJPsych Bulletin, 40(6), 302–305. https://doi.org/10.1192/pb.bp.115.052449

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free