A novel G protein-biased agonist at the d opioid receptor with analgesic efficacy in models of chronic pain

61Citations
Citations of this article
80Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Agonists at the d opioid receptor are known to be potent antihyperalgesics in chronic pain models and effective in models of anxiety and depression. However, some d opioid agonists have proconvulsant properties while tolerance to the therapeutic effects can develop. Previous evidence indicates that different agonists acting at the d opioid receptor differentially engage signaling and regulatory pathways with significant effects on behavioral outcomes. As such, interest is now growing in the development of biased agonists as a potential means to target specific signaling pathways and potentially improve the therapeutic profile of d opioid agonists. Here, we report on PN6047 (3-[[4-(dimethylcarbamoyl)phenyl]-[1-(thiazol-5-ylmethyl)-4-piperidylidene]methyl]benzamide), a novel G protein-biased and selective d opioid agonist. In cell-based assays, PN6047 fully engages G protein signaling but is a partial agonist in both the arrestin recruitment and internalization assays. PN6047 is effective in rodent models of chronic pain but shows no detectable analgesic tolerance following prolonged treatment. In addition, PN6047 exhibited antidepressant-like activity in the forced swim test, and importantly, the drug had no effect on chemically induced seizures. PN6047 did not exhibit reward-like properties in the conditioned place preference test or induce respiratory depression. Thus, d opioid ligands with limited arrestin signaling such as PN6047 may be therapeutically beneficial in the treatment of chronic pain states.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Conibear, A. E., Asghar, J., Hill, R., Henderson, G., Borbely, E., Tekus, V., … Kelly, E. (2020). A novel G protein-biased agonist at the d opioid receptor with analgesic efficacy in models of chronic pain. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, 372(2), 224–236. https://doi.org/10.1124/JPET.119.258640

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free