Reinforced Concrete Beams with FRP and Hybrid Steel–FRP Composite Bars: Load–Deflection Response, Failure Mechanisms, and Design Implications

7Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Corrosion concerns motivate the use of alternatives to conventional steel reinforcement in RC beams. This review evaluates fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) bars and hybrid steel–FRP composite bars (SFCBs) used for durability-critical applications. We conducted a structured literature search focused on 2010–2025 and included seminal pre-2010 studies for context. Experimental studies and code provisions were screened to synthesize evidence on load–deflection response, cracking, and failure, with brief notes on UHPC systems. FRP-RC offers corrosion resistance but limited ductility and an abrupt post-peak response. Steel is ductile and provides warning before failure. SFCB combines durability with steel-core ductility and yields gradual softening and higher energy absorption. Practice should select reinforcement based on stiffness–ductility–durability trade-offs. Current codes only partially cover hybrids. Key gaps include standardized bond–slip and tension-stiffening models for SFCB and robust data on long-term performance under aggressive exposure.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dziomdziora, P., & Smarzewski, P. (2025, September 1). Reinforced Concrete Beams with FRP and Hybrid Steel–FRP Composite Bars: Load–Deflection Response, Failure Mechanisms, and Design Implications. Materials. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18184381

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free