Therapists’ and clients’ ratings of real relationship, attachment, therapist self-disclosure, and treatment progress

20Citations
Citations of this article
86Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objective: While there has been much research on the role of the working alliance in psychotherapy, researchers only recently began investigating the role of the real relationship in treatment. Methods: In the current study on therapist and client dyads, we used actor–partner interdependence modeling (APIM) to examine associations between therapists’ and clients’ ratings of the real relationship, therapist self-disclosure, attachment, and treatment progress. APIM analyses allowed for an examination into how therapists’ and clients’ views of a particular phenomenon might affect their own ratings (actor), as well as the others’ (partner) ratings of that same phenomenon. Results: Significant negative associations between therapist self-reported attachment anxiety and avoidance and therapist-rated real relationship and treatment progress. Significant positive associations were found between client-rated real relationship and client-rated treatment progress. These results and others are discussed in the context of the literature along with implications for future research in this area.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fuertes, J. N., Moore, M., & Ganley, J. (2019). Therapists’ and clients’ ratings of real relationship, attachment, therapist self-disclosure, and treatment progress. Psychotherapy Research, 29(5), 594–606. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2018.1425929

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free