Evaluation of a clinical scoring system and directed laboratory testing for respiratory virus infection in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients

5Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

A simple clinical screening (CS) tool for respiratory virus (RV) infection was introduced and evaluated in a single hematology ward, as part of a strategy to reduce nosocomial RV infection. Up to 6 clinical symptoms or signs were scored and a predefined threshold score of ≥2 prompted paired nose/throat swab (NTS) collection for RV testing. The criterion standard for RV infection was positive immunofluorescence (IF) or polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for 7 and 15 viruses, respectively. The tool was shown to be most beneficial at excluding infection at a threshold score of 1 (negative predictive value [NPV] 89%, [95% confidence interval 78-96%], sensitivity 85% [70-94%], specificity 35% [27-43%]), compared with a score of 2 (NPV 85% [76-91%], sensitivity 63% [46-77%], specificity 57% [48-65%]) at a prevalence of 22%. The tool's ability to diagnose infection was limited (positive predictive value 27% and 29% at thresholds 1 and 2). The sensitivity of IF compared with PCR was 45% for the 7 viruses common to both, and 23% for the extended virus panel detected by PCR. An algorithm incorporating CS, paired NTS collection at a threshold of 1 symptom or sign, and sensitive testing including PCR can guide infection control measures in hospitalized hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. © 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ferguson, P. E., Gilroy, N. M., Sloots, T. P., Nissen, M. D., Dwyer, D. E., & Sorrell, T. C. (2011). Evaluation of a clinical scoring system and directed laboratory testing for respiratory virus infection in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. Transplant Infectious Disease, 13(5), 448–455. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3062.2011.00631.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free