Beneficence, justice, and health care

12Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper argues that societal duties of health promotion are underwritten (at least in large part) by a principle of beneficence. Further, this principle generates duties of justice that correlate with rights, not merely "imperfect" duties of charity or generosity. To support this argument, I draw on a useful distinction from bioethics and on a somewhat neglected approach to social obligation from political philosophy. The distinction is that between general and specific beneficence; and the approach from political philosophy has at times been called equality of concern. After clarifying the distinction and setting out the basis of the equality of concern view, I argue that the result is a justice-based principle of "specific" beneficence that should be reflected in a society's health policy. I then draw on this account to criticize, refine, and extend some prominent health care policy proposals from the bioethics literature. © 2014 by The Johns Hopkins University Press.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Paul Kelleher, J. (2014). Beneficence, justice, and health care. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 24(1), 27–49. https://doi.org/10.1353/ken.2014.0004

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free