Cocrystals of 6-propyl-2-thio-uracil: N-H⋯O versus N-H⋯S hydrogen bonds

11Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In order to investigate the relative stability of N-H⋯O and N-H⋯S hydrogen bonds, we cocrystallized the anti-thyroid drug 6-propyl-2-thio-uracil with two complementary heterocycles. In the cocrystal pyrimidin-2-amine-6-propyl-2-thio-uracil (1/2), C 4H 5N 3·2C 7H 10N 2OS, (I), the base pair is connected by one N-H⋯S and one N-H⋯N hydrogen bond. Homodimers of 6-propyl-2-thio-uracil linked by two N-H⋯S hydrogen bonds are observed in the cocrystal N-(6-acetamido-pyridin-2-yl)acetamide-6-propyl-2- thio-uracil (1/2), C 9H 11N 3O 2· 2C 7H 10N 2OS, (II). The crystal structure of 6-propyl-2-thio-uracil itself, C 7H 10N 2OS, (III), is stabilized by pairwise N-H⋯O and N-H⋯S hydrogen bonds. In all three structures, N-H⋯S hydrogen bonds occur only within R 22(8) patterns, whereas N-H⋯O hydrogen bonds tend to connect the homo-and heterodimers into extended networks. In agreement with related structures, the hydrogen-bonding capability of C=O and C=S groups seems to be comparable. © 2011 International Union of Crystallography.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tutughamiarso, M., & Egert, E. (2011). Cocrystals of 6-propyl-2-thio-uracil: N-H⋯O versus N-H⋯S hydrogen bonds. Acta Crystallographica Section C: Crystal Structure Communications, 67(11). https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108270111037991

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free