Is consent to autopsy necessary? Cartesian dualism in medicine and its limitations

9Citations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

When a hospitalization ends in death, a request for an autopsy can lead to an emotionally charged encounter between a physician and the deceased patient's family. A case is presented in which a cardiac surgeon, believing he might have made a mistake, requests an autopsy, but members of the deceased patient's family believe that she would not have wanted an autopsy performed. A central question discussed in this commentary is whether and when consent for autopsy is necessary. We discuss two theoretical frameworks that support differing views on this question. Beyond engaging this philosophical discussion, we also highlight a practical approach to discussing an autopsy with a grieving family by using the case presented.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lane, M., & Vercler, C. J. (2016). Is consent to autopsy necessary? Cartesian dualism in medicine and its limitations. AMA Journal of Ethics, 18(8), 771–778. https://doi.org/10.1001/journalofethics.2016.18.8.ecas2-1608

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free