Musculoskeletal foot problems in primary care: What influences older people to consult?

19Citations
Citations of this article
74Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective: To estimate the incidence of, and factors associated with, consultation for musculoskeletal foot problems in primary care. Methods: Survey data from 13 986 people aged ≥50 years who took part in the North Staffordshire Osteoarthritis Project were linked to a database of primary care consultations. Foot problems were defined as responding affirmatively to the questions: 'Have you had any problems with your feet over the last year?' or 'Have you had pain in the last year in and around the foot?'. The main outcome measure was a record of a musculoskeletal foot-related consultation within 18 months following the survey. Results: Of the 3858 participants with foot problems who had not consulted before the survey, 350 (9.1%) consulted in the 18 months following the survey. Age, sex, education, general health and pain in other regions were not associated with future consultation. However, those who consulted were more likely to have reported foot pain [adjusted odds ratio (OR) 2.04; 95% CI 1.22, 3.42) and to consider treatments to be effective in controlling disease (OR 1.54; 95% CI 1.07, 2.21) in the baseline survey, and to have been a frequent consulter in the 18 months before the survey (OR 1.65; 95% CI 1.30, 2.09). Conclusions: Only a minority of older people with musculoskeletal foot problems consult their general practitioner about them. Foot pain, frequent consultation for other problems and positive perceptions of treatment efficacy appear to be the strongest factors influencing future consultation. © The Author 2010. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Menz, H. B., Jordan, K. P., Roddy, E., & Croft, P. R. (2010). Musculoskeletal foot problems in primary care: What influences older people to consult? Rheumatology, 49(11), 2109–2116. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keq206

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free