Towards a structural inequality framework for student retention and success

50Citations
Citations of this article
76Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

University campuses are increasingly diverse, reflecting substantial growth in student enrolments, but this has not translated to equitable outcomes for all students. While much attention has been focused on student retention and success, particularly for those from non-traditional backgrounds, dominant theoretical models rest on a limited notion of cultural capital that places undue responsibility on students themselves. We suggest that structural inequality, whereby some people receive unequal privileges and opportunities, offers a more productive, less problematic framework for use by academic staff, university leaders and policy makers to address these challenges. In this article, we identify three types of structural inequality–vertical, horizontal, and internal–and include a taxonomy of internal inequalities to prompt further research and policy outcomes. Put simply, rather than ask how students can build cultural capital to assimilate to their institutions, we should ask what institutions can do to include students, staff, and the wider community.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Naylor, R., & Mifsud, N. (2020). Towards a structural inequality framework for student retention and success. Higher Education Research and Development, 39(2), 259–272. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2019.1670143

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free