Cholesteryl ester transfer protein and high density lipoprotein responses to cholesterol feeding in men: Relationship to apolipoprotein E genotype

110Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The apolipoprotein (apo) E isoform is an important determinant of the plasma lipoprotein distribution of apoE and of the metabolism of apoE- containing lipoproteins. We have determined the effects of apoE genotype on the plasma lipoprotein response to cholesterol feeding in 30 young normal male subjects (5 E3/2, 11 E3/3, 14 E4/3) under rigorously controlled dietary conditions. Two diets, differing only in cholesterol content (low cholesterol (LC): 80 mg cholesterol/1000 kcal and high cholesterol (HC): 320 mg cholesterol/1000 kcal), were compared using a random crossover design. At the end of the HC as compared to the LC period, total cholesterol (TC), low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and HDL2-C increased by an average of 15%, 21%, 7%, and 23%, respectively, for the three genotype groups combined (P < 0.001 for each). The LDL-C response to dietary cholesterol did not differ among the apoE genotypes. However, the increase in HDL-C varied significantly according to the apoE genotype (E3/2: 0 change, E3/3: +4%, E4/3: +12%; P < 0.05). The plasma cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) response to cholesterol feeding also differed amongst the three apoE genotype groups (E3/2: +37%, E3/3: +18%, E4/3: +9%) (P < 0.05). ApoE genotype has significant and opposite effects on plasma CETP and HDL-C responses to dietary cholesterol in men.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Martin, L. J., Connelly, P. W., Nancoo, D., Wood, N., Zu Jun Zhang, Maguire, G., … McPherson, R. (1993). Cholesteryl ester transfer protein and high density lipoprotein responses to cholesterol feeding in men: Relationship to apolipoprotein E genotype. Journal of Lipid Research, 34(3), 437–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-2275(20)40735-7

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free