In vivo stability evaluation of Mg substituted low crystallinity ß-tricalcium phosphate granules fabricated through dissolution-precipitation reaction for bone regeneration

5Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Although β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) is widely used in clinical applications as a bone substitute owing to its positive tissue response and its ability to be replaced by new bone through a bone-remodeling process, it has the limitation of rapid resorption in vivo, which might become a reason for tissue atrophy and high crystallinity, which decrease biocompatibility. A reduction in the crystallinity might increase the biocompatibility of the bone substitute. To overcome the drawbacks of β-TCP, decrease in crystallinity and solubility, both are required. Therefore, in this study, the feasibility of fabricating Mg substituted low crystalline β-TCP (Mg-LC-β-TCP) granules formed in aqueous solution was evaluated in vivo focusing long-term adsorption and bone formation in bone defects formed in the rabbit femur using sintered β-TCP granules as a control. With Mg-LC-β-TCP, the resorption of the substitute was suppressed, and no tissue atrophy was observed even at 24 weeks post-implantation, whereas a few granules with surrounding tissue atrophy were observed at 12 weeks post-implantation. Tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase-staining indicated that the density of osteoclasts type cells with Mg-LC-β-TCP was significantly lower than that with β-TCP, and also the numbers of osteoblasts type cells with Mg-LC-β-TCP were significantly higher than that with β-TCP. It is suggested that Mg substitution to form low crystallinity β-TCP is a valuable way to overcome the limitations of β-TCP as a bone substitute.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tripathi, G., Sugiura, Y., Tsuru, K., & Ishikawa, K. (2018). In vivo stability evaluation of Mg substituted low crystallinity ß-tricalcium phosphate granules fabricated through dissolution-precipitation reaction for bone regeneration. Biomedical Materials (Bristol), 13(6). https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-605X/aad385

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free