The relationship between multiple levels of learning practices and objective and subjective organizational financial performance

42Citations
Citations of this article
143Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Multi-level learning approaches suggest that individuals, groups and organizations act both independently and interact dynamically to contribute to organizational performance. We directly examined this proposition in an Australian sample using a longitudinal design that employed subjective and objective financial performance data. Respondents completed a survey that provided details on their individual, team and organizational learning practices (ILP, TLP and OLP, respectively), and self assessed performance compared to 3 years ago. Concurrently, we collected objective performance data (sales/employee numbers) at 3 yearly intervals and averaged these data to create an index. Using hierarchical and moderated regression, we found a positive main effect for OLP with both subjective and objective performance. Main effects for ILP and TLP were not found. Further, we found a significant interaction between ILP and TLP such that the effect of TLP on productivity was better in organizations with less ILP. Three-way interactions were not found. Overall, these results provide some support for the model. We discuss some limitations of the study and make recommendations for future studies. © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

di Milia, L., & Birdi, K. (2010). The relationship between multiple levels of learning practices and objective and subjective organizational financial performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(4), 481–498. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.623

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free