Effects of Simulation Fidelity on Health Care Providers on Team Training - A Systematic Review

5Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This systematic review, following PRISMA standards, aimed to assess the effectiveness of higher versus lower fidelity simulation on health care providers engaged in team training. A comprehensive search from January 1, 2011 to January 24, 2023 identified 1390 studies of which 14 randomized (n = 1530) and 5 case controlled (n = 257) studies met the inclusion criteria. The certainty of evidence was very low due to a high risk of bias and inconsistency. Heterogeneity prevented any metaanalysis. Limited evidence showed benefit for confidence, technical skills, and nontechnical skills. No significant difference was found in knowledge outcomes and teamwork abilities between lower and higher fidelity simulation. Participants reported higher satisfaction but also higher stress with higher fidelity materials. Both higher and lower fidelity simulation can be beneficial for team training, with higher fidelity simulation preferred by participants if resources allow. Standardizing definitions and outcomes, as well as conducting robust cost-comparative analyses, are important for future research.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mitchell, S., Blanchard, E., Curran, V., Hoadley, T., Donoghue, A., & Lockey, A. (2024). Effects of Simulation Fidelity on Health Care Providers on Team Training - A Systematic Review. Simulation in Healthcare, 19(1), S50–S56. https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000762

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free