Comparison of two methods of intravenous administration of morphine for postoperative pain relief

27Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Morphine sulphate was used for the control of pain following major abdominal surgery for a period of three days either as patient-controlled or continuous infusion. The two groups of patients were comparable with regard to patient and operation details, duration of infusion, pain scores and complications. The only significant difference was a reduced dose requirement of morphine in the patient-controlled analgesia group (P < 0.005). Some possible explanations for this finding are given. It is suggested that a properly supervised continuous infusion of morphine is as good as patient-controlled administration. There was a negative correlation between the age of the patient and the dose of morphine used.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zacharias, M., Pfeifer, M. V., & Herbison, P. (1990). Comparison of two methods of intravenous administration of morphine for postoperative pain relief. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, 18(2), 205–209. https://doi.org/10.1177/0310057x9001800208

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free