Induction therapy in head and neck cancer. A comparison of two regimens

13Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Seventy‐two patients with advanced resectable head and cancer received two courses of induction chemotherapy before definitive therapy. Forty‐six patients were treated with platinol, Oncovin (vincristine), and bleomycin. Twenty‐six received Platinol (cisplatin), Velban (vinblastine), and 5‐fluorouracil (5‐FU). Although both regimens had an overall response rate of 80% or more, the bleomycin‐containing regimen had a higher complete response rate and better long‐term disease control, with >60% probability of remaining disease‐free (36 month minimum follow‐up). As given in this regimen, the 5‐FU regimen was well tolerated but had a higher incidence of stomatitis and a low rate of complete responses. When the two regimens were compared to a historical control, the regimen with Platinol, Oncovin, and bleomycin was significantly better. Copyright © 1986 American Cancer Society

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Spaulding, M., Ziegler, P., Sundquist, N., Klotch, D., Lee, K., Khan, A., & Lore, J. (1986). Induction therapy in head and neck cancer. A comparison of two regimens. Cancer, 57(6), 1110–1114. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(19860315)57:6<1110::AID-CNCR2820570608>3.0.CO;2-6

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free