Social distancing, lockdown and thewide use of mask; a magic solution or a double-edged sword for respiratory viruses epidemiology?

52Citations
Citations of this article
61Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The use of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs), such as social distancing, lockdowns and the massive use of masks, have not only largely prevented the spread of SARS-CoV-2, but also of other respiratory viruses such as influenza or respiratory syncytial virus (RSV). This decrease has been so high that, in most countries, the influenza and RSV epidemic has not occurred. Far from being a beneficial fact, this can be problematic, since the absence of circulation of certain pathogens can lead to a decrease in herd immunity against them. This can promote the rise of more serious, longer-lasting epidemics that start sooner. To alleviate the collateral effects that may occur due to the decrease in circulation of viruses such as influenza, it is necessary to increase the production of influenza vaccines, carry out mass vaccination campaigns and focus on vaccinating the main drivers of this virus, children.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sanz-Muñoz, I., Tamames-Gómez, S., Castrodeza-Sanz, J., Eiros-Bouza, J. M., & de Lejarazu-Leonardo, R. O. (2021). Social distancing, lockdown and thewide use of mask; a magic solution or a double-edged sword for respiratory viruses epidemiology? Vaccines, 9(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9060595

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free