Expectations and outcomes in electronic identity management: The role of trust and public value

67Citations
Citations of this article
418Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This paper is concerned with the issues facing stakeholders attempting to develop, implement and maintain electronic identity management (IdM) systems in government. It argues that perceptions of electronic IdM vary, and thus a single conceptualisation of the concept is difficult. Using data collected from stakeholders in 17 European countries, Canada, New Zealand and the U.S.A. from 2003 through 2007, a qualitative analysis identifies 10 dominant stakeholder areas of concern which we term themes. These are then mapped onto a framework of public value due to Grimsley and Meehan which relates services to outcomes and the development of trust. We conclude by questioning the conceptualisation of trust within the context of IdM, and suggesting that considering trust as the mitigation of relational risk is more appropriate. We also consider the usefulness of public value as a notion for informing IdM and highlight the lack of national differences in our diverse data set.© 2010 Operational Research Society Ltd. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Seltsikas, P., & O’Keefe, R. M. (2010). Expectations and outcomes in electronic identity management: The role of trust and public value. European Journal of Information Systems, 19(1), 93–103. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2009.51

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free