Abstract
(HCWs). We investigated different HCWs influenza immunization programs within Friuli Venezia Giulia (FVG) Region hospitals (Italy) during 2019-20 flu season with the aim of identifying the most effective strategies to tackle hesitancy. Methods: In December 2019 we collected from FVG hospitals: number of employed HCWs, vaccination strategies against flu and refusers management during 2019-20 flu season. We obtained data about HCWs flu vaccination coverage from the regional database; Chi-square test was used to find correlation between strategies and coverage. Results: We collected data from 7/7 hospitals for a total of employed HCWs of 12,557 (average 1,794; range 467-3,922); 2 hospitals being academic centers and 2 research institutions. All hospitals promoted flu vaccination using emails, notice on hospital website and posters display; 3/7 organized training courses. Vaccination was always provided within the hospital in a dedicated easy and free access room; most hospitals (5/7) also offered ward on-site sessions, some allowing ward self-administration (3/7) or organizing on demand extra-sessions (2/7). No countermeasures were taken in case of refusal. Regional HCWs flu vaccination coverage resulted to be 24.9% (range 17-33.3). Multi-component intervention including passive and active offer, communication and education activities was confirmed to be significantly associated with higher HCWs flu coverage (OR 1.7; CI 1.6-1.9; p < 0.01), as well as being the hospital an academic center or a research institution (OR 1.3; CI 1.2-1.5; p < 0.01). Conclusions: Different strategies to foster HCWs vaccination were adopted in FVG Region during 2019-20 flu season. The multi-component approach producing the best results should be further analyzed in order to identify the most effective recipe to be shared both nationally and internationally. Key messages: Investigating the relation between HCWs flu immunization strategies and their effect is crucial to identify best practices. A multi-component approach including passive and active offer, communication and education activities seems the most effective way to tackle influenza vaccine hesitancy among HCWs. Background: Vaccination has been evaluated and was found to be the most successful and cost-effective interventions to preventing illness and improve health outcomes. However, internationally, an increase in vaccine hesitancy has led to a decrease in vaccination uptake. We conducted an umbrella review to assess the factors related to under-vaccination and non-vaccination from a global perspective. Methods: PubMed, EMBASE and Science Direct were searched from inception to December 2019 for systematic reviews and meta-analyses that examined the factors affecting vaccination choices. No restrictions on language, publication date, vaccination type, setting, or population were applied. Narrative and extensive reviews were excluded. A narrative synthesis was undertaken to present the results thematically. Results: Twenty-two systematic reviews met the inclusion criteria. The published evidence on this topic shows that, overall, a variety of complex factors exist related to vaccine hesitancy. Across all articles included, the main areas of concern were around
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Giannakou, K., & Vachtsioli, E. (2020). Understanding hesitancy around vaccines and vaccination: an umbrella review. European Journal of Public Health, 30(Supplement_5). https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckaa166.1421
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.