Understanding hesitancy around vaccines and vaccination: an umbrella review

  • Giannakou K
  • Vachtsioli E
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

(HCWs). We investigated different HCWs influenza immunization programs within Friuli Venezia Giulia (FVG) Region hospitals (Italy) during 2019-20 flu season with the aim of identifying the most effective strategies to tackle hesitancy. Methods: In December 2019 we collected from FVG hospitals: number of employed HCWs, vaccination strategies against flu and refusers management during 2019-20 flu season. We obtained data about HCWs flu vaccination coverage from the regional database; Chi-square test was used to find correlation between strategies and coverage. Results: We collected data from 7/7 hospitals for a total of employed HCWs of 12,557 (average 1,794; range 467-3,922); 2 hospitals being academic centers and 2 research institutions. All hospitals promoted flu vaccination using emails, notice on hospital website and posters display; 3/7 organized training courses. Vaccination was always provided within the hospital in a dedicated easy and free access room; most hospitals (5/7) also offered ward on-site sessions, some allowing ward self-administration (3/7) or organizing on demand extra-sessions (2/7). No countermeasures were taken in case of refusal. Regional HCWs flu vaccination coverage resulted to be 24.9% (range 17-33.3). Multi-component intervention including passive and active offer, communication and education activities was confirmed to be significantly associated with higher HCWs flu coverage (OR 1.7; CI 1.6-1.9; p < 0.01), as well as being the hospital an academic center or a research institution (OR 1.3; CI 1.2-1.5; p < 0.01). Conclusions: Different strategies to foster HCWs vaccination were adopted in FVG Region during 2019-20 flu season. The multi-component approach producing the best results should be further analyzed in order to identify the most effective recipe to be shared both nationally and internationally. Key messages: Investigating the relation between HCWs flu immunization strategies and their effect is crucial to identify best practices. A multi-component approach including passive and active offer, communication and education activities seems the most effective way to tackle influenza vaccine hesitancy among HCWs. Background: Vaccination has been evaluated and was found to be the most successful and cost-effective interventions to preventing illness and improve health outcomes. However, internationally, an increase in vaccine hesitancy has led to a decrease in vaccination uptake. We conducted an umbrella review to assess the factors related to under-vaccination and non-vaccination from a global perspective. Methods: PubMed, EMBASE and Science Direct were searched from inception to December 2019 for systematic reviews and meta-analyses that examined the factors affecting vaccination choices. No restrictions on language, publication date, vaccination type, setting, or population were applied. Narrative and extensive reviews were excluded. A narrative synthesis was undertaken to present the results thematically. Results: Twenty-two systematic reviews met the inclusion criteria. The published evidence on this topic shows that, overall, a variety of complex factors exist related to vaccine hesitancy. Across all articles included, the main areas of concern were around

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Giannakou, K., & Vachtsioli, E. (2020). Understanding hesitancy around vaccines and vaccination: an umbrella review. European Journal of Public Health, 30(Supplement_5). https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckaa166.1421

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free