Extreme diversity of phage amplification rates and phage–antibiotic interactions revealed by PHORCE

5Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Growth rate plays a fundamental role in microbiology and serves as an important proxy for fitness in evolution. While high-throughput measurements of bacterial growth rates are easily performed in any microbiology laboratory, similar methods are lacking for bacteriophages. This gap hinders systematic comparisons of important phage phenotypes, such as their amplification rate in bacterial populations and their bactericidal effect, across different phages and environmental conditions. Here, we show that the amplification rate of lytic phages can be quantified by analyzing bacterial population growth and collapse dynamics under phage predation using a parsimonious mathematical model – an approach termed Phage-Host Observation for Rate estimation from Collapse Events (PHORCE). We found that the resulting phage amplification rate captures the bactericidal effect independent of initial phage and bacterial population sizes for fast-growing hosts and adsorption-limited phages. Using high-throughput PHORCE, we found that the amplification rates of Escherichia coli phages vary widely by more than three orders of magnitude. Furthermore, our approach suggests that phage–antibiotic interactions are predominantly determined by the antibiotic, and not by the phage. In particular, the ribosomeinhibiting antibiotic doxycycline generally showed antagonism with phage amplification, whereas the DNA-damaging antibiotic nitrofurantoin was synergistic. This framework provides a means to quantitatively characterize phage phenotypes and may facilitate future high-throughput phage screens for antibacterial applications.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mulla, Y., Müller, J., Trimcev, D., & Bollenbach, T. (2025). Extreme diversity of phage amplification rates and phage–antibiotic interactions revealed by PHORCE. PLoS Biology, 23(4 April). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3003065

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free