Investigating Different Data-Traceability Approaches to Prevent Data Swamps [Perspectives]

0Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Science users typically obtain data from authoritative or trusted sources referred to as repositories. An authoritative source is defined as an entity that is approved by a legal entity to develop or manage data for a specific purpose [4], [5]. Different government agencies generating Earth observation (EO) data are one example. An authoritative source can also be an actively managed repository of valid or trusted data that is recognized by a community and supports data governance and stewardship practices. One can also have secondary sources that serve as trusted sources and provide trusted data [6]. A trusted source can be a service provider or an organization that publishes data obtained from a number of authoritative sources. These publications are often compilations and subsets of the data from more than one authoritative source. They are 'trusted' because there is an 'official process and/or agreement' for compiling the data from authoritative sources, data are actively managed, and the limitations, currency, and attributes are known and documented. NASA mirroring Sentinel-1 data from the European Space Agency is one such example of a trusted source.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ramachandran, R., Maskey, M., Lynnes, C., John, A., & Mukherjee, T. (2022, September 1). Investigating Different Data-Traceability Approaches to Prevent Data Swamps [Perspectives]. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. https://doi.org/10.1109/MGRS.2022.3203865

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free