A Critical Review on the Factors Affecting the Bond Strength of Direct Restorative Material Alternatives to Amalgam

7Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This article comprehensively reviews the performance of simplified direct restorative materials that have the potential to be an alternative to amalgam. Following an understanding of the material structures and clinical performances, this review provides an analysis of the bonding mechanisms and influential factors on the bond strength. These factors include substrate-related variations, involving primary vs. permanent dentin, sound- vs. caries-affected/demineralized dentin comparisons and surface-related factors and pretreatments. Special attention is given to the factors changing the substrate surface, such as different contaminants, remedy methods after contamination and different conditioning methods related to the materials. Variations in sample preparation and bond strength test parameters are also evaluated for the analysis of the outcomes. This review aims to provide an overview of the factors involved in the application procedure of direct restorations together with in vitro testing variations to guide the selection of suitable materials by understanding strengths and shortcomings.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Batu Eken, Z., & Ilie, N. (2024, October 1). A Critical Review on the Factors Affecting the Bond Strength of Direct Restorative Material Alternatives to Amalgam. Materials. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17194853

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free